Frankenstein's Attempt to abandon the Creature in the Real Monster Essay

Frankensteins Attempt to abandon the Creature in the Real Monster - Essay ExampleTherefore, the rhetorical question that rises here is who is the real ogre then? On the surface level, it seems that since Dr. Frankenstein has created, he is the real iniquity or the real freak. But a deeper analysis get out necessarily reveal that Dr. Frankenstein as a scientist who is good willed enough to discover the mystery of Nature in order to remove the imperfection is the devil rather his disposition to abandon his creature (also his failure to socialize it) because of its pallid appearance is the real monster in this case. The Real Monster Frankensteins Refusal to Socialize the Creature Those who assume Dr. Frankenstein himself as the real monster argue that his taste to create life is to be interpreted as a monstrous disgust against nature and the will of God. The foundation of Frankensteins offense against Nature is Frankenstein is a rebel against nature when he tries not only to fin d the secret of life but also to remove lifes defects (Rohrmoser 3). Such plan that homogeneous the legendary Prometheus, Doctor Frankenstein kindle be held responsible for offense against nature and God is win strengthened by the supposition that eventually Shellys protagonist has been punished by nature for committing much(prenominal) crime. But this proposal about Frankensteins offense against nature confronts a simple question, Does Frankenstein intends to create a monster? Textual evidences eventually will reveal that Doctor Frankenstein has no intention to create a monster rather his sole objective is to amend the natures imperfection by hold on the secrets of life. Indeed his ignorance about how to nurture his creature that apparently looks like an evil causes the final havoc he suffers in the end of the novel. By effectively producing a naive imitative being, he primarily propounds that bit can grab the secrets of life and death and searching for the secrets of life a nd death is nothing blasphemous. But Frankensteins monstrous crime lies in the fact that he abandons the lab-made creature because of its ghastly look instantly subsequently its birth. Obviously he commits this crime being ignorant of his duty that greater knowledge imposes upon him and by refusing to make up the motherly role of nurturing the creature. He has not committed any crime by seeking the secrets of life. being of a Naive Monster A Success of Frankensteins Good-willed Research Mary Shellys attempt to endow the monster with humanly feelings and yearnings fundamentally refutes the claim that the creature is a monster. At the same succession it also propounds that Frankensteins research in natures secrets is neither impossible not profane. The ghastly appearance of the creature is not enough to prove that Frankensteins monstrous intention to go against the will of God has failed. Indeed his success lies in the fact that he has successfully created a being that can learn l ike a man that also has humanly yearnings to love and to be loved. The creature wants to feel a female one. Such want proves its desire to love and to be loved. Instead of being gross out by the creatures ghastly appearance, Frankenstein as a responsible scientist could socialize him. But like an ambitious scientists, his ambition drives him to achieve fame without being responsible towards his creation. Frankenstein himself recognizes the flaw of his ambition in the following sentences, How knockout is the acquirement of knowledge, and how much happier that man is who